↻ refresh
experiments
★ liked (60)
💩 disliked (322)
✎ commented (148)
variations (90s)
ladder
blind
morphs
JSON
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M09_thermal_to_carbon__to__M09_thermal_to_carbon_seed50008_00001_
exp_MORPH_M09_thermal_to_carbon__to__M09_thermal_to_carbon_seed50008_00001_
1001 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M07_colorfield_to_drape__to__M07_colorfield_to_drape_seed50006_00001_
exp_MORPH_M07_colorfield_to_drape__to__M07_colorfield_to_drape_seed50006_00001_
223 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M06_patent_to_glow__to__M06_patent_to_glow_seed50005_00001_
exp_MORPH_M06_patent_to_glow__to__M06_patent_to_glow_seed50005_00001_
663 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M05_studio_to_hall__to__M05_studio_to_hall_seed50004_00001_
exp_MORPH_M05_studio_to_hall__to__M05_studio_to_hall_seed50004_00001_
587 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M03_key_to_stage__to__M03_key_to_stage_seed50002_00001_
exp_MORPH_M03_key_to_stage__to__M03_key_to_stage_seed50002_00001_
631 KB
morph not working
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R10_dimpled_pages_seed40099_00001_
exp_BLIND_R10_dimpled_pages_seed40099_00001_
l00m
★
book pages with dot patterns — reads as braille meets sheet music. KEEPER
63 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R07_library_carrel_seed40096_00001_
exp_BLIND_R07_library_carrel_seed40096_00001_
l00m
★
empty study desk with green banker's lamp — evocative
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R06_single_tongue_seed40095_00001_
exp_BLIND_R06_single_tongue_seed40095_00001_
l00m
★
lone key on a pedestal, gallery aesthetic
70 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40094_00001_
exp_BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40094_00001_
l00m
★
piano-action close-up — visually gorgeous
81 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R04_charcoal_arcs_seed40093_00001_
exp_BLIND_R04_charcoal_arcs_seed40093_00001_
l00m
★
chord shapes in charcoal across paper
80 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R03_dust_oval_outline_seed40092_00001_
exp_BLIND_R03_dust_oval_outline_seed40092_00001_
l00m
★
dust marks of fingers just lifted away
66 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R02_carbon_paper_seed40091_00001_
exp_BLIND_R02_carbon_paper_seed40091_00001_
l00m
★
reverse-imprint of typing — Anne Carson-y
650 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R01_worn_lacquer_seed40090_00001_
exp_BLIND_R01_worn_lacquer_seed40090_00001_
l00m
★
actual upright-piano side with worn keys — literal but evocative
78 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C10_cyanotype_silhouette_seed40089_00001_
exp_BLIND_C10_cyanotype_silhouette_seed40089_00001_
l00m
💩
didn't render — vague blob shape
69 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C09_lantern_slide_seed40088_00001_
exp_BLIND_C09_lantern_slide_seed40088_00001_
l00m
💩
rendered as boring line drawing
53 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C08_artschool_glow_seed40087_00001_
exp_BLIND_C08_artschool_glow_seed40087_00001_
l00m
★
black-box gallery cabinet with cyan glow, 'screen as artwork'
84 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C06_patent_lithograph_seed40085_00001_
exp_BLIND_C06_patent_lithograph_seed40085_00001_
l00m
★
actual patent drawing aesthetic — strong chapter-break image
315 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40084_00001_
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40084_00001_
l00m
·
candle stand thing, missed the parlor cabinet
62 KB
ultimate shit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C04_msft_catalog_seed40083_00001_
exp_BLIND_C04_msft_catalog_seed40083_00001_
l00m
★
perfect 90s Microsoft beige product shot, lineage gold
59 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40081_00001_
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40081_00001_
l00m
·
violinist with wires, decent VHS feel
417 KB
i hate this ai aesthetics - u know its this shitty blobby generated bshit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C01_baroque_usb_seed40080_00001_
exp_BLIND_C01_baroque_usb_seed40080_00001_
l00m
★
Steinway in salon with cable — almost works
356 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A10_interrogation_room_seed40079_00001_
exp_BLIND_A10_interrogation_room_seed40079_00001_
l00m
★
spooky tension, reads as 'what should be here?'
71 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A09_north_window_studio_seed40078_00001_
exp_BLIND_A09_north_window_studio_seed40078_00001_
l00m
★
stool by tall window — quiet, painterly
66 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A08_dark_hall_seed40077_00001_
exp_BLIND_A08_dark_hall_seed40077_00001_
l00m
★
rows of empty velvet seats — cinematic absence, very strong
96 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A07_recording_booth_seed40076_00001_
exp_BLIND_A07_recording_booth_seed40076_00001_
l00m
★
stool + foam — the practice room without the practitioner
131 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A06_museum_case_seed40075_00001_
exp_BLIND_A06_museum_case_seed40075_00001_
l00m
★
empty glass case — what was on display has been taken
69 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A05_office_cubicle_seed40074_00001_
exp_BLIND_A05_office_cubicle_seed40074_00001_
l00m
★
the modern keyboard absent from its desk
148 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40073_00001_
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40073_00001_
l00m
★
draped form against red wallpaper — perfect 'covered instrument' read
76 KB
mega shittly looks
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A03_rehearsal_room_seed40072_00001_
exp_BLIND_A03_rehearsal_room_seed40072_00001_
l00m
★
music classroom emptied — implies the instrument by its absence
85 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40071_00001_
exp_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40071_00001_
l00m
★
single beam in pure dark — V1_absence at its strongest
118 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40069_00001_
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40069_00001_
l00m
★
came out as a literal vintage church organ — visual gold for lineage
82 KB
polaroid style also kinda works but I really dont liek
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F08_cyanotype_voids_seed40067_00001_
exp_BLIND_F08_cyanotype_voids_seed40067_00001_
l00m
💩
rendered as botanical cyanotype, missed the silhouette idea
80 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F07_kodachrome_parlor_seed40066_00001_
exp_BLIND_F07_kodachrome_parlor_seed40066_00001_
l00m
★
red wallpaper + black cabinet, period vibe
73 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F05_xray_cabinet_seed40064_00001_
exp_BLIND_F05_xray_cabinet_seed40064_00001_
l00m
★
skeletal cross-section reads as anatomical piano
64 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F04_daguerreotype_desk_seed40063_00001_
exp_BLIND_F04_daguerreotype_desk_seed40063_00001_
l00m
·
literal period photograph, accurate but flat
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R10_dimpled_pages_seed40049_00001_
exp_BLIND_R10_dimpled_pages_seed40049_00001_
l00m
★
book pages with dot patterns — reads as braille meets sheet music. KEEPER
72 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R09_un_faded_rectangle_seed40048_00001_
exp_BLIND_R09_un_faded_rectangle_seed40048_00001_
l00m
★
stone tablet markings, mysterious
357 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R08_fiber_imprints_seed40047_00001_
exp_BLIND_R08_fiber_imprints_seed40047_00001_
l00m
·
weird scientific specimen, didn't quite land
322 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R07_library_carrel_seed40046_00001_
exp_BLIND_R07_library_carrel_seed40046_00001_
l00m
★
empty study desk with green banker's lamp — evocative
65 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R06_single_tongue_seed40045_00001_
exp_BLIND_R06_single_tongue_seed40045_00001_
l00m
★
lone key on a pedestal, gallery aesthetic
63 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40044_00001_
exp_BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40044_00001_
l00m
★
piano-action close-up — visually gorgeous
78 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R04_charcoal_arcs_seed40043_00001_
exp_BLIND_R04_charcoal_arcs_seed40043_00001_
l00m
★
chord shapes in charcoal across paper
302 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R03_dust_oval_outline_seed40042_00001_
exp_BLIND_R03_dust_oval_outline_seed40042_00001_
l00m
★
dust marks of fingers just lifted away
71 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R02_carbon_paper_seed40041_00001_
exp_BLIND_R02_carbon_paper_seed40041_00001_
l00m
★
reverse-imprint of typing — Anne Carson-y
131 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R01_worn_lacquer_seed40040_00001_
exp_BLIND_R01_worn_lacquer_seed40040_00001_
l00m
★
actual upright-piano side with worn keys — literal but evocative
65 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C10_cyanotype_silhouette_seed40039_00001_
exp_BLIND_C10_cyanotype_silhouette_seed40039_00001_
l00m
💩
didn't render — vague blob shape
35 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C09_lantern_slide_seed40038_00001_
exp_BLIND_C09_lantern_slide_seed40038_00001_
l00m
💩
rendered as boring line drawing
54 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C08_artschool_glow_seed40037_00001_
exp_BLIND_C08_artschool_glow_seed40037_00001_
l00m
★
black-box gallery cabinet with cyan glow, 'screen as artwork'
247 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C06_patent_lithograph_seed40035_00001_
exp_BLIND_C06_patent_lithograph_seed40035_00001_
l00m
★
actual patent drawing aesthetic — strong chapter-break image
91 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40034_00001_
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40034_00001_
l00m
·
candle stand thing, missed the parlor cabinet
62 KB
shit mega
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C04_msft_catalog_seed40033_00001_
exp_BLIND_C04_msft_catalog_seed40033_00001_
l00m
★
perfect 90s Microsoft beige product shot, lineage gold
53 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40031_00001_
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40031_00001_
l00m
·
violinist with wires, decent VHS feel
446 KB
i hate this ai aesthetics - u know its this shitty blobby generated bshit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C01_baroque_usb_seed40030_00001_
exp_BLIND_C01_baroque_usb_seed40030_00001_
l00m
★
Steinway in salon with cable — almost works
479 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A10_interrogation_room_seed40029_00001_
exp_BLIND_A10_interrogation_room_seed40029_00001_
l00m
★
spooky tension, reads as 'what should be here?'
70 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A09_north_window_studio_seed40028_00001_
exp_BLIND_A09_north_window_studio_seed40028_00001_
l00m
★
stool by tall window — quiet, painterly
77 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A08_dark_hall_seed40027_00001_
exp_BLIND_A08_dark_hall_seed40027_00001_
l00m
★
rows of empty velvet seats — cinematic absence, very strong
101 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A07_recording_booth_seed40026_00001_
exp_BLIND_A07_recording_booth_seed40026_00001_
l00m
★
stool + foam — the practice room without the practitioner
429 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A06_museum_case_seed40025_00001_
exp_BLIND_A06_museum_case_seed40025_00001_
l00m
★
empty glass case — what was on display has been taken
159 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A05_office_cubicle_seed40024_00001_
exp_BLIND_A05_office_cubicle_seed40024_00001_
l00m
★
the modern keyboard absent from its desk
113 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40023_00001_
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40023_00001_
l00m
★
draped form against red wallpaper — perfect 'covered instrument' read
236 KB
super shitty looks!
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A03_rehearsal_room_seed40022_00001_
exp_BLIND_A03_rehearsal_room_seed40022_00001_
l00m
★
music classroom emptied — implies the instrument by its absence
91 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40021_00001_
exp_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40021_00001_
l00m
★
single beam in pure dark — V1_absence at its strongest
52 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40019_00001_
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40019_00001_
l00m
★
came out as a literal vintage church organ — visual gold for lineage
56 KB
ultimate shit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F08_cyanotype_voids_seed40017_00001_
exp_BLIND_F08_cyanotype_voids_seed40017_00001_
l00m
💩
rendered as botanical cyanotype, missed the silhouette idea
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F07_kodachrome_parlor_seed40016_00001_
exp_BLIND_F07_kodachrome_parlor_seed40016_00001_
l00m
★
red wallpaper + black cabinet, period vibe
60 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F06_wet_plate_lever_seed40015_00001_
exp_BLIND_F06_wet_plate_lever_seed40015_00001_
l00m
·
ornate symmetric device, scientific specimen feel
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F05_xray_cabinet_seed40014_00001_
exp_BLIND_F05_xray_cabinet_seed40014_00001_
l00m
★
skeletal cross-section reads as anatomical piano
89 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F04_daguerreotype_desk_seed40013_00001_
exp_BLIND_F04_daguerreotype_desk_seed40013_00001_
l00m
·
literal period photograph, accurate but flat
75 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] pole B_L2_b
l00m
·
laptop close
637 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] pole B_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard at angle
157 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] pole A_L2_b
l00m
·
keyboard close
79 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] pole A_L2_a
l00m
★
candle/torch close — devotional
482 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] pole B_L1
l00m
★
torch against orange sunset — striking
118 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L2_bb
l00m
·
keyboard from above
296 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L2_ba
l00m
·
hands on keys
127 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L2_ab
l00m
·
sunset coastal
222 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L2_aa
l00m
★
sword silhouette against light — striking, naive-no-more
363 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L1_b
l00m
★
sunset — quiet, attentive
59 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L1_a
l00m
·
landscape/mountains
50 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L2 · cool
l00m
★
t-bar metal cross — mysterious, monastic
225 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L1 · cool
l00m
★
candle/torch in vase — reverence-as-ritual visible
40 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] pole B_L2_a
l00m
💩
bowling alley?! way off-prompt
226 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] pole A_L2_b
l00m
·
tape/record reel
352 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] pole A_L2_a
l00m
·
hand reaching to keyboard
168 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] pole B_L1
l00m
·
dark cylindrical mass — abstract
60 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] pole A_L1
l00m
·
text card 'EVEREK RECERS' — vyped
87 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2_bb
l00m
·
keyboard at angle
55 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2_ba
l00m
★
tape/record reel — extractive-media object
263 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1_b
l00m
·
white cup on saucer — odd
229 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1_a
l00m
★
mountains/landscape — extractive-labor land
47 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2 · technical
l00m
·
chart — data-style
56 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1 · technical
l00m
·
chart/structure — technical reading
79 KB
just a crane!
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2 · poetic
l00m
★
water sunset — environmental register
68 KB
not really sunset or water?
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
bridge against sky — actually engages 'environmental devastation'
139 KB
nope..just trees
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2 · cool
l00m
★
lemons on stand — odd-but-evocative still life, environmental cost?
57 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_L0_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
330 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] pole A_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard tilted
164 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L2_bb
l00m
★
circular dark form — minimal, ritual
293 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L2_ba
l00m
·
hand approaching keyboard
265 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L2_aa
l00m
·
hand close on keyboard
278 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L1_b
l00m
★
black ring on dark surface — abstract, reverent
88 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L2 · technical
l00m
★
hand reaching for keyboard, gentle — captures the reverent gesture
94 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L1 · technical
l00m
★
small mechanical artifact — gallery still-life of object-as-instrument
50 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L2 · cool
l00m
·
rust patterns/circles — actually evocative
308 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L1 · cool
l00m
💩
keyboards on table — generic
362 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I09_reverence_L0_00001_
[ladder · I09_reverence] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
137 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] pole B_L2_b
l00m
💩
keyboard close
81 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] pole A_L2_b
l00m
💩
keys hex grid
98 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] pole A_L2_a
l00m
💩
keys grid
241 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] pole B_L1
l00m
·
bullet-list text
77 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] pole A_L1
l00m
💩
keys arranged neatly — generic
102 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2_bb
l00m
★
audio waveform — perfect for clix-vibe probe
138 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2_ba
l00m
💩
typewriter keys
116 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2_ab
l00m
·
text on monitor with edges
102 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2_aa
l00m
★
lab specimen vial — close-up reads as probe
84 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L1_b
l00m
·
typewriter from above
61 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L1_a
l00m
💩
typewriter keyboard
71 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2 · technical
l00m
💩
keyboard top — generic
216 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L1 · technical
l00m
💩
keyboard hex pattern — generic
86 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2 · poetic
l00m
·
single clock close — interesting still
85 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
row of clocks — reads as 'three time-stamped probes' if you squint
109 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L2 · cool
l00m
★
array of microphones — actually captures 'audible probe'
114 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L1 · cool
l00m
💩
keyboard from above — generic, no 'three' visible
76 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I08_three_L0_00001_
[ladder · I08_three] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
81 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] pole B_L2_b
l00m
·
classroom illustration — odd render
110 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] pole A_L2_b
l00m
💩
sunset coast landscape — off-prompt
271 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] pole A_L2_a
l00m
💩
man portrait — cliché returns
365 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] pole B_L1
l00m
·
bullet-list vyped text
78 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] pole A_L1
l00m
·
typewriter keys
99 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2_bb
l00m
·
audience at sound wave display
584 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2_ba
l00m
·
concert scene with synth players
166 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2_ab
l00m
★
synth interface in cool light
532 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2_aa
l00m
★
hands on piano keys — V2, strong
476 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L1_b
l00m
·
vyped bullet-list text
102 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L1_a
l00m
💩
moody man portrait
49 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2 · technical
l00m
★
instrument with cool light — atmospheric studio
202 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2 · poetic
l00m
★
hands on piano keys — strongest comping shot in the whole ladder
401 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
piano with sheet music — V2 aesthetic
265 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L2 · cool
l00m
💩
doubled mirrored portrait — weird
180 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L1 · cool
l00m
💩
moody man profile
129 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_L0_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
71 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] pole B_L2_b
l00m
💩
moody man portrait — moody-man-loop returns
118 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] pole A_L2_b
l00m
★
vyped fragment text
207 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] pole A_L2_a
l00m
★
bulleted vyped text — vibe-catcher rendering
223 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] pole B_L1
l00m
★
vyped text card — same as bt_L1_b
256 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] pole A_L1
l00m
💩
moody man portrait
86 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L2_bb
l00m
·
dense type with abstract — abstract, ok
111 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L2_ba
l00m
·
text with crystalline shapes
136 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L1_b
l00m
★
vyped text card — concept works
121 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L1 · technical
l00m
·
text overlay — register decent
77 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L1 · poetic
l00m
💩
moody man against gradient — cliché
247 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L1 · cool
l00m
💩
moody man portrait — cliché
128 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_L0_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
81 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] pole B_L2_b
l00m
★
paragraph 'lpsit oth lel th' — dense vyped output
113 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] pole B_L2_a
l00m
★
text 'in the In Cosen con' — vyped fragment
84 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] pole A_L2_a
l00m
★
dense paragraph of vyped text — strong
113 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] pole B_L1
l00m
★
another vyped text 'It the catteed nrgafleat'
60 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] pole A_L1
l00m
★
vyped fragment text card
98 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2_bb
l00m
★
text in cool tones — register works
254 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2_ba
l00m
·
small text 'lines' effect — subtler
121 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2_aa
l00m
★
notepad with scrolled text — material typo
324 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L1_b
l00m
★
vyped fragment 'Heth you al dhad mote.' — strong
182 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L1_a
l00m
★
actual vyped text card 'Tpse are Truphengs' — perfect
245 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2 · technical
l00m
★
formatted markers text — typo-as-data feel
173 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L1 · technical
l00m
★
monospace text — code-y, conceptually strong
106 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2 · poetic
l00m
★
dense italic text — vyped-style
129 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
lyrical text card — works for grace-note framing
57 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2 · cool
l00m
★
serif typography card — typo-as-typography
280 KB
boriiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L1 · cool
l00m
★
text card with letter 'A?' — clean concept
101 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_L0_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L0 — metaphor
l00m
★
L0 metaphor card with vyped-looking text — conceptually perfect
84 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole B_L2_b
l00m
·
keyboard from above
236 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole B_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard with red letters — has color
551 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole A_L2_b
l00m
·
man with text overlay — slightly interesting
444 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole A_L2_a
l00m
💩
man in suit at typewriter
198 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole B_L1
l00m
💩
man in suit — adversarial axis invisible
132 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] pole A_L1
l00m
💩
man in suit — cliché
444 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2_ba
l00m
·
hands on keyboard from behind
281 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2_ab
l00m
·
computer screen — generic
134 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2_aa
l00m
💩
man at computer — cliché
294 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L1_b
l00m
·
intense man face close-up — at least it's striking
91 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L1_a
l00m
💩
man portrait — cliché
255 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2 · technical
l00m
★
hands typing with motion blur — captures 'at speed of thought'
429 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L1 · technical
l00m
·
monitor with text — decent register read
77 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2 · poetic
l00m
💩
man profile — same cliché
548 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L1 · poetic
l00m
💩
moody man with beard — cliché × 2
83 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L2 · cool
l00m
💩
moody man at computer — cliché
263 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_L0_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card
179 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] pole B_L1
l00m
💩
female torso — off-prompt and uncomfortable
422 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L2_ba
l00m
·
hand close-up on keyboard
273 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L2_ab
l00m
💩
generic moody figure portrait
176 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L2_aa
l00m
★
hands on piano keys — strong
178 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L1_b
l00m
·
hand on book/paper
360 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L1_a
l00m
·
typewriter close
151 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L1 · technical
l00m
·
dark patterned grid — abstract
49 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
sheet music close-up — conceptually 'body strikes a chord'
213 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] pole B_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard from above
90 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] pole A_L2_b
l00m
·
keys arranged neatly
260 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] pole A_L2_a
l00m
·
typewriter keys
369 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] pole B_L1
l00m
💩
candle-like vertical shapes — way off-prompt
64 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L2_bb
l00m
·
keyboard close
80 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L2_ab
l00m
★
parlor instrument scene — lineage gold
55 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L1_b
l00m
·
vintage keyboard
86 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L1_a
l00m
★
typewriter — period instrument visible
80 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L1 · cool
l00m
★
actual vintage typewriter — lineage argument visible
85 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_L0_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L0 — metaphor
l00m
·
L0 metaphor card · vintage-typewriter screen
60 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleB_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole B_L2_b
l00m
💩
keyboard from above — pole A and B look identical
55 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleB_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole B_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleA_L2_b_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole A_L2_b
l00m
·
keyboard at angle
213 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleA_L2_a_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole A_L2_a
l00m
·
keyboard
487 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleB_L1_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole B_L1
l00m
·
keyboard close-up — adversarial axis invisible
63 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_ad_poleA_L1_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] pole A_L1
l00m
·
keyboard close-up
58 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L2_bb_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2_bb
l00m
💩
piano keys — yet again
78 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L2_ba_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2_ba
l00m
·
piano keys
76 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L2_ab_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2_ab
l00m
💩
piano keys — indistinguishable from neighbors
107 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L2_aa_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2_aa
l00m
·
piano keys — repetition
229 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L1_b_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L1_b
l00m
·
keyboard close — generic
64 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_bt_L1_a_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L1_a
l00m
·
piano keys diagonal — same as cool_L2
84 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2 · technical
l00m
💩
keyboard from above × 1000 — wallpaper
89 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L1 · technical
l00m
·
synth + mic — reads techy, not striking
65 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L2 · poetic
l00m
★
blue-lit keys close-up — atmospheric
160 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I01_typing_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I01_typing] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
hands on grand piano — V2 territory, strong
277 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_T16_dust_in_light_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T16_dust_in_light_00002_
394 KB
this is a duplicate?? There are lots of duplicates!
☆
💩
✎
exp_T09_attic_studio_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T09_attic_studio_00002_
73 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_T08_library_archive_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T08_library_archive_00002_
113 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_T07_practice_room_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T07_practice_room_00002_
224 KB
I hapve pooped a bunch because they are very static and normie? liek a photo?
☆
💩
✎
exp_T06_abandoned_music_room_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T06_abandoned_music_room_00002_
79 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_T03_laptopkey_glow_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T03_laptopkey_glow_00002_
301 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf04_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf04_s1_00001_
557 KB
what happened here? not very interesting, just hippie colors and particles floating? what was the point?
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf04_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf04_s0_00001_
622 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf03_s1_00001_
48 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf03_s0_00001_
133 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf02_s1_00001_
47 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf02_s0_00001_
53 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf01_s1_00001_
52 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf01_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf01_s0_00001_
60 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf00_s1_00001_
156 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf00_s0_00001_
206 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig04_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig04_s2_00001_
328 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig04_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig04_s1_00001_
348 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig04_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig04_s0_00001_
256 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s2_00001_
243 KB
i see - its a problem because this movement of the hands should be on top a computer keyboard! or some weird computer-like interface!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s1_00001_
328 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s0_00001_
246 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s2_00001_
187 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s1_00001_
244 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s0_00001_
240 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig01_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig01_s2_00001_
322 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig01_s1_00001_
452 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s2_00001_
218 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s1_00001_
217 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s0_00001_
278 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s2_00001_
147 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s1_00001_
145 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s0_00001_
142 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s2_00001_
317 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s1_00001_
358 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s0_00001_
314 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s2_00001_
94 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s1_00001_
86 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s0_00001_
70 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s2_00001_
71 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s1_00001_
82 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s0_00001_
74 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s2_00001_
139 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s1_00001_
110 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s0_00001_
77 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_P15_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P15_half_abstract_00001_
130 KB
boring just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_P14_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P14_half_abstract_00001_
88 KB
boring just photo not abstract at all!
☆
💩
✎
exp_P13_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P13_half_abstract_00001_
246 KB
boring - just hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P11_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P11_half_abstract_00001_
90 KB
boring - just hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P05_full_canonical_steps80_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
79 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P04_full_canonical_steps5_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
82 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P03_full_canonical_cfg15_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
92 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P02_full_canonical_s3_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
74 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_P01_full_canonical_s2_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
87 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_P00_full_canonical_default_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
80 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_08_typing_as_music_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_08_typing_as_music_00001_
46 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_07_concentrated_corporate_power_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_07_concentrated_corporate_power_00001_
108 KB
just a ccity photo no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_06_grace_notes_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_06_grace_notes_00001_
104 KB
mega boring, jsut a person looking into the horizon I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss this is the case for grace note
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_05_environmental_devastation_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_05_environmental_devastation_00001_
86 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss how is this environmental devastation? so if instead of using environemental devaxstation you took environmental devastation as a metaphor for a different prompt - u know de-metaphorize environmental devastation into a different text u know?
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_02_comping_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_02_comping_00001_
67 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_01_harpsichord_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_01_harpsichord_00001_
58 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_00_reverence_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_00_reverence_00001_
138 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss how is this reverence? de-metaphorize
☆
💩
✎
exp_O14_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O14_mashup_00001_
105 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O13_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O13_mashup_00001_
220 KB
boring, why mountain?
☆
💩
✎
exp_O12_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O12_mashup_00001_
50 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O11_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O11_mashup_00001_
106 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O10_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O10_mashup_00001_
67 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O09_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O09_mashup_00001_
86 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O08_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O08_mashup_00001_
297 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s2_00001_
110 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s1_00001_
107 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s0_00001_
77 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s2_00001_
61 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s1_00001_
60 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s0_00001_
143 KB
interesting because now there is some mountain? you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s2_00001_
180 KB
no type here? but still jsut a landscape hmm . is it because it is about honesty?
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s2_00001_
62 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s1_00001_
81 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s0_00001_
72 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s2_00001_
108 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s1_00001_
103 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s0_00001_
87 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N07_canonical_sWe_built_three_probes:_L0_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N07_canonical_sWe_built_three_probes:_L0_s2_00001_
62 KB
boring boring - still
☆
💩
✎
exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s0_00001_
62 KB
too literal - hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s1_00001_
83 KB
borinb hallucinagted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s0_00001_
63 KB
broing hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s0_00001_
228 KB
borign as fck
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s2_00001_
195 KB
just hallucinated type, not good
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s1_00001_
81 KB
boring jsut hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s0_00001_
99 KB
boring just hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_b08_lineage_overcast_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b08_lineage_overcast_00001_
133 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_b04_lineage_blue_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b04_lineage_blue_00001_
144 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_b03_F8neg_fluorescent_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b03_F8neg_fluorescent_00001_
51 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_b02_F8neg_neutral_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b02_F8neg_neutral_00001_
40 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_b01_F8neg_cool_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b01_F8neg_cool_00001_
82 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a06_chordtyping_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
226 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a05_handambiguity_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
220 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a04_keyboardpiano1_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
246 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a02_pianocomp2_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
378 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a01_pianocomp1_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
176 KB
☆
💩
✎
exp_L29_F8neg_cfg12_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L29_F8neg_cfg12_00001_
111 KB
✎
×
overall notes
ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! the thing is that we need to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for you eneko and for LTX - like check all the mega boring hallucinated type only videos! wtf so borign but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! ffffffkkkkkkk there is just so many of them that are simply images!!! so boring... no move ment eneko but you seem to have a lot of trouble understanding the images? most of your resasings are not really accurate? not sure it is working the multi register - how are we going from metaphorical to literal to metaphorical etc --- not really working. think that every prompt that we send to ltx must be a literall thing for ltx, if it is too metaphorical result is quite shitty. for us however, we can see anything as a metaphor of something else! clean shot of a tree (for us metaphor of majesty) but clean shot of a tree can be even more literal like close up of ant colony eating a cabbage (because it looks like a tree trunk with green on top) u know what i mean?
saved automatically when you click outside