↻ refresh
experiments
★ liked (60)
💩 disliked (322)
✎ commented (148)
variations (90s)
ladder
blind
morphs
JSON
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M10_neg_to_text__to__M10_neg_to_text_seed50009_00001_
exp_MORPH_M10_neg_to_text__to__M10_neg_to_text_seed50009_00001_
461 KB
not great but weirdness is kinda ok
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M03_key_to_stage__to__M03_key_to_stage_seed50002_00001_
exp_MORPH_M03_key_to_stage__to__M03_key_to_stage_seed50002_00001_
631 KB
morph not working
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M02_text_to_dimples__to__M02_text_to_dimples_seed50001_00001_
exp_MORPH_M02_text_to_dimples__to__M02_text_to_dimples_seed50001_00001_
594 KB
morph works!
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_M01_vyped_to_carbon__to__M01_vyped_to_carbon_seed50000_00001_
exp_MORPH_M01_vyped_to_carbon__to__M01_vyped_to_carbon_seed50000_00001_
823 KB
morph works!
☆
💩
✎
exp_MORPH_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40021_00001___to__BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40044_00001__seed1766296070_00001_
exp_MORPH_BLIND_A02_dark_stage_seed40021_00001___to__BLIND_R05_blackened_hammers_seed40044_00001__seed1766296070_00001_
603 KB
not great but morphs kinda works
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_R08_fiber_imprints_seed40097_00001_
exp_BLIND_R08_fiber_imprints_seed40097_00001_
l00m
·
weird scientific specimen, didn't quite land
382 KB
yes! this didnt quite land things might be intereting - weird is ok
★
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C07_nasa_console_seed40086_00001_
exp_BLIND_C07_nasa_console_seed40086_00001_
l00m
·
decent line drawing, didn't fully land
332 KB
but its that old aesthetic that the model really gets to make...interesting
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40084_00001_
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40084_00001_
l00m
·
candle stand thing, missed the parlor cabinet
62 KB
ultimate shit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40081_00001_
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40081_00001_
l00m
·
violinist with wires, decent VHS feel
417 KB
i hate this ai aesthetics - u know its this shitty blobby generated bshit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40073_00001_
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40073_00001_
l00m
★
draped form against red wallpaper — perfect 'covered instrument' read
76 KB
mega shittly looks
★
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A01_white_cube_plinth_seed40070_00001_
exp_BLIND_A01_white_cube_plinth_seed40070_00001_
l00m
★
empty plinth in white-cube gallery — peak Alexander aesthetic
57 KB
aesthetic works
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40069_00001_
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40069_00001_
l00m
★
came out as a literal vintage church organ — visual gold for lineage
82 KB
polaroid style also kinda works but I really dont liek
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F09_vhs_dropouts_seed40068_00001_
exp_BLIND_F09_vhs_dropouts_seed40068_00001_
l00m
·
cabinet in office with cable, decent
242 KB
yes! technique works! with the zoom and everything!
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C07_nasa_console_seed40036_00001_
exp_BLIND_C07_nasa_console_seed40036_00001_
l00m
·
decent line drawing, didn't fully land
242 KB
maybe works for the lineage images?
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40034_00001_
exp_BLIND_C05_polaroid_child_parlor_seed40034_00001_
l00m
·
candle stand thing, missed the parlor cabinet
62 KB
shit mega
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40031_00001_
exp_BLIND_C02_vhs_electrodes_seed40031_00001_
l00m
·
violinist with wires, decent VHS feel
446 KB
i hate this ai aesthetics - u know its this shitty blobby generated bshit
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40023_00001_
exp_BLIND_A04_victorian_drape_seed40023_00001_
l00m
★
draped form against red wallpaper — perfect 'covered instrument' read
236 KB
super shitty looks!
★
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_A01_white_cube_plinth_seed40020_00001_
exp_BLIND_A01_white_cube_plinth_seed40020_00001_
l00m
★
empty plinth in white-cube gallery — peak Alexander aesthetic
51 KB
aesthetic works
☆
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40019_00001_
exp_BLIND_F10_polaroid_600_child_seed40019_00001_
l00m
★
came out as a literal vintage church organ — visual gold for lineage
56 KB
ultimate shit
★
💩
✎
exp_BLIND_F09_vhs_dropouts_seed40018_00001_
exp_BLIND_F09_vhs_dropouts_seed40018_00001_
l00m
·
cabinet in office with cable, decent
195 KB
technique works! we should explore further!
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I11_reverence_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I11_reverence] L1 · technical
l00m
·
hands on keyboard
80 KB
no hands no keyboard!
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1 · technical
l00m
·
chart/structure — technical reading
79 KB
just a crane!
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L2 · poetic
l00m
★
water sunset — environmental register
68 KB
not really sunset or water?
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I10_troubled_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I10_troubled] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
bridge against sky — actually engages 'environmental devastation'
139 KB
nope..just trees
★
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I07_comping_mr_technical_L1_00001_
[ladder · I07_comping] L1 · technical
l00m
·
synthesizer interface — techy read
64 KB
interesting composition
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_technical_L2_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L2 · technical
l00m
★
dense vyped text card — actually captures 'absorbs degraded input'
425 KB
yea kinda ok
★
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L2 · poetic
l00m
💩
man profile — moody-man-loop
144 KB
interesting weirdness
★
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I06_vibe_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I06_vibe] L2 · cool
l00m
·
man with landscape behind — at least there's depth
123 KB
but there is no man here?! eneko wtf??
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I05_typos_mr_cool_L2_00001_
[ladder · I05_typos] L2 · cool
l00m
★
serif typography card — typo-as-typography
280 KB
boriiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I04_vyping_mr_cool_L1_00001_
[ladder · I04_vyping] L1 · cool
l00m
💩
man in suit at typewriter — cliché
600 KB
but there is no suit?!
☆
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I03_body_mr_poetic_L2_00001_
[ladder · I03_body] L2 · poetic
l00m
·
keyboard from above
451 KB
hmm..yeahm kinda from above but not really right?
★
💩
✎
exp_LDR_I02_keyboard_mr_poetic_L1_00001_
[ladder · I02_keyboard] L1 · poetic
l00m
★
grand piano in dim parlor — period feel
300 KB
nice and strange - might work
☆
💩
✎
exp_T16_dust_in_light_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T16_dust_in_light_00002_
394 KB
this is a duplicate?? There are lots of duplicates!
☆
💩
✎
exp_T07_practice_room_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T07_practice_room_00002_
224 KB
I hapve pooped a bunch because they are very static and normie? liek a photo?
☆
💩
✎
exp_T05_inkblot_letter_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T05_inkblot_letter_00002_
395 KB
interresting thing this hallucinated letter
☆
💩
✎
exp_T04_finger_landing_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T04_finger_landing_00002_
391 KB
closeup interesting
☆
💩
✎
exp_T02_typebar_strike_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T02_typebar_strike_00002_
281 KB
weird mechanism is good! the movement also, deceiving mechanics and obvious phisical principles, it makes sense and it doesnt!
☆
💩
✎
exp_T01_singlekey_resonance_00002_
[T ultra-long] exp_T01_singlekey_resonance_00002_
337 KB
also this, strange resonances and mechanics are great
☆
💩
✎
exp_T24_comping_visual_00001_
[T ultra-long] exp_T24_comping_visual_00001_
325 KB
habah hi
☆
💩
✎
exp_T23_vibe_catcher_literal_00001_
[T ultra-long] exp_T23_vibe_catcher_literal_00001_
164 KB
yea! lets try different ways of metabolize a vibe catcher!
☆
💩
✎
exp_T21_keyboard_memory_00001_
[T ultra-long] exp_T21_keyboard_memory_00001_
53 KB
almost there! too yellow light but some variations of this top view of made up keyboards u know
★
💩
✎
exp_T17_vibration_waves_00001_
[T ultra-long] exp_T17_vibration_waves_00001_
224 KB
yea somethign about this vibration waves would be good - but this again, medievval, cyberpunk i dont like at all - the yellowish light maaaahhh beh
★
💩
✎
exp_R_handlin_cfg0.5_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_handlin_cfg0.5_s2_00001_
433 KB
lopving this one too - same weirdf overlay, worth exploring further
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_handlin_cfg0.5_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_handlin_cfg0.5_s1_00001_
418 KB
something weird is happening here - can you check whats going on? its interesting like a sketch and layers...interesting also the weirdness of the hands
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf04_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf04_s1_00001_
557 KB
what happened here? not very interesting, just hippie colors and particles floating? what was the point?
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf04_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf04_s0_00001_
622 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf03_s1_00001_
48 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf03_s0_00001_
133 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf02_s1_00001_
47 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf02_s0_00001_
53 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf01_s1_00001_
52 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf01_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf01_s0_00001_
60 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf00_s1_00001_
156 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_cf00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_cf00_s0_00001_
206 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s2_00001_
243 KB
i see - its a problem because this movement of the hands should be on top a computer keyboard! or some weird computer-like interface!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s1_00001_
328 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig03_s0_00001_
246 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s2_00001_
187 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s1_00001_
244 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig02_s0_00001_
240 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig01_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig01_s2_00001_
322 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig01_s1_00001_
452 KB
boring!
★
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig01_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig01_s0_00001_
374 KB
this maybe is a bit tiny bit better than all the ther piano playing videos? at least there is a keyboard? can we lean into the weirdness of the ghost in the shell scene where a cyborg splits their hand into multiple micro fingers - u know?
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s2_00001_
218 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s1_00001_
217 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_ambig00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_ambig00_s0_00001_
278 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s2_00001_
147 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s1_00001_
145 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt04_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt04_s0_00001_
142 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s2_00001_
317 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s1_00001_
358 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt03_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt03_s0_00001_
314 KB
boring!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s2_00001_
94 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s1_00001_
86 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt02_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt02_s0_00001_
70 KB
not dynamic! just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s2_00001_
71 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s1_00001_
82 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt01_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt01_s0_00001_
74 KB
not dynamic! just photo! boring...
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s2_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s2_00001_
139 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s1_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s1_00001_
110 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_R_melt00_s0_00001_
[R winner-doubling] exp_R_melt00_s0_00001_
77 KB
boriiiiing
☆
💩
✎
exp_P15_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P15_half_abstract_00001_
130 KB
boring just photo!
☆
💩
✎
exp_P14_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P14_half_abstract_00001_
88 KB
boring just photo not abstract at all!
☆
💩
✎
exp_P13_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P13_half_abstract_00001_
246 KB
boring - just hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P11_half_abstract_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P11_half_abstract_00001_
90 KB
boring - just hallucinated text
★
💩
✎
exp_P10_canonical_in_neg_steps5_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P10_canonical_in_neg_steps5_00001_
41 KB
kinda interesting but very static - not moving
★
💩
✎
exp_P09_canonical_in_neg_cool_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P09_canonical_in_neg_cool_00001_
189 KB
abstract and intersting but a bit borign
☆
💩
✎
exp_P08_canonical_in_neg_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P08_canonical_in_neg_00001_
265 KB
kinda interesting, the movement and the abstraction-
★
💩
✎
exp_P06_canonical_x2_00001_
[P mega-prompt] exp_P06_canonical_x2_00001_
89 KB
somethign going on herre but a bit boring, no movement...
☆
💩
✎
exp_P05_full_canonical_steps80_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
79 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P04_full_canonical_steps5_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
82 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_P03_full_canonical_cfg15_00001_
[FULL TEXT] entire canonical/vyped corpus
92 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
★
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_09_the_body_that_types_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_09_the_body_that_types_00001_
270 KB
haha what is this? a naked chest! love the weirdness but hmmm
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_08_typing_as_music_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_08_typing_as_music_00001_
46 KB
boring..only foto and hallucianted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_07_concentrated_corporate_power_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_07_concentrated_corporate_power_00001_
108 KB
just a ccity photo no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_06_grace_notes_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_06_grace_notes_00001_
104 KB
mega boring, jsut a person looking into the horizon I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss this is the case for grace note
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_05_environmental_devastation_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_05_environmental_devastation_00001_
86 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss how is this environmental devastation? so if instead of using environemental devaxstation you took environmental devastation as a metaphor for a different prompt - u know de-metaphorize environmental devastation into a different text u know?
★
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_04_extractive_labor_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_04_extractive_labor_00001_
266 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss but this is kinda interesting! how is this extractive labor - i love it ! i think i can see it! u know? dont understand the framing but whatever
★
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_03_vibe_catcher_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_03_vibe_catcher_00001_
84 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss same as vibe catcher here - although a hot guy in a field winking CAN be a vibe catcher hahaha - this is the kind of de-matophorizing from the cannonical text that might work?
☆
💩
✎
exp_O_pw_00_reverence_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O_pw_00_reverence_00001_
138 KB
I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss how is this reverence? de-metaphorize
☆
💩
✎
exp_O14_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O14_mashup_00001_
105 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O13_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O13_mashup_00001_
220 KB
boring, why mountain?
☆
💩
✎
exp_O12_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O12_mashup_00001_
50 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O11_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O11_mashup_00001_
106 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O10_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O10_mashup_00001_
67 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O09_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O09_mashup_00001_
86 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_O08_mashup_00001_
[O canonical mashup] exp_O08_mashup_00001_
297 KB
boring.- only hallucinated texyt
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s2_00001_
110 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s1_00001_
107 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N12_canonical_sSo_I_am_vyping_this_so_yo_s0_00001_
77 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s2_00001_
61 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s1_00001_
60 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N11_canonical_sReverence_is_less_innocen_s0_00001_
143 KB
interesting because now there is some mountain? you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s2_00001_
180 KB
no type here? but still jsut a landscape hmm . is it because it is about honesty?
★
💩
✎
exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s1_00001_
200 KB
inetersting one too?
★
💩
✎
exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N10_canonical_sWhile_sitting_honestly_wi_s0_00001_
314 KB
thisi s kinda beautiful! like a silver ink made landscape - good mixing on metaphors or why this works so well ?
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s2_00001_
62 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s1_00001_
81 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N09_canonical_sThe_paper_proposes_revere_s0_00001_
72 KB
you see!? so interesting - this is too literal, jsut producign hallucinated text! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? the metaphorical and the literal! we have to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for LTX and fo ryou eneko! ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! thi sis extremely literal and that is why it is producing mega borin hallucinated type
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s2_00001_
108 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s1_00001_
103 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N08_canonical_sEach_makes_a_different_re_s0_00001_
87 KB
but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! boring hallucinated type no movement
☆
💩
✎
exp_N07_canonical_sWe_built_three_probes:_L0_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N07_canonical_sWe_built_three_probes:_L0_s2_00001_
62 KB
boring boring - still
☆
💩
✎
exp_N06_canonical_sComping_is_structural._s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N06_canonical_sComping_is_structural._s2_00001_
155 KB
a bit more intersting - how did this happen?
★
💩
✎
exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s2_00001_
789 KB
vibe catcher? interesting metaphorically
☆
💩
✎
exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s1_00001_
146 KB
i seee it is taking the vibe catcher a s adream catcher and making literal in this way ?
★
💩
✎
exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N05_canonical_sA_vibe_catcher,_the_llm_a_s0_00001_
598 KB
loving this one too a bit more! liek how is it happening i wonder but ok, the abstrraction takes us somewhere
☆
💩
✎
exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s1_00001_
85 KB
too literal - hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N04_canonical_sTypos_are_grace_notes,_pr_s0_00001_
62 KB
too literal - hallucinated text
★
💩
✎
exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s2_00001_
105 KB
boring but intersting bogr abstraction
☆
💩
✎
exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s1_00001_
83 KB
borinb hallucinagted text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N02_canonical_sThe_body_that_types_into__s0_00001_
63 KB
broing hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s2_00001_
67 KB
ok is not supere good but getting there a bit mbetter too static
☆
💩
✎
exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s1_00001_
66 KB
this. one is kinda doing it, although it is just an image, this we can use later - somehgow doing somethign
☆
💩
✎
exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N01_canonical_sThe_keyboard_as_an_instru_s0_00001_
228 KB
borign as fck
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s2_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s2_00001_
195 KB
just hallucinated type, not good
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s1_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s1_00001_
81 KB
boring jsut hallucinated text
☆
💩
✎
exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s0_00001_
[N canonical sentence] exp_N00_canonical_sThis_is_a_paper_about_typ_s0_00001_
99 KB
boring just hallucinated text
★
💩
✎
exp_M_b07_chord_dawn_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b07_chord_dawn_00001_
322 KB
interesting! gettng there!
★
💩
✎
exp_M_b06_F8neg_cfg15_cool_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b06_F8neg_cfg15_cool_00001_
287 KB
interesting too, i think the model is comign through here
★
💩
✎
exp_M_b05_F8neg_steps5_cool_00001_
[M cool palette] exp_M_b05_F8neg_steps5_cool_00001_
96 KB
intersting too - the model maybe coming through`?
☆
💩
✎
exp_M_a07_doubleinstrument_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
93 KB
interesting composition...hm somethign might be here
★
💩
✎
exp_M_a03_pianocomp3_00001_
[M ambiguity] piano-keyboard hybrid
143 KB
this one kinda works! but jkeys are still too pianoish - otherwis good - maybe in an offce would be beter?
★
💩
✎
exp_L28_F8neg_cfg20_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L28_F8neg_cfg20_00001_
1.8 MB
love tyhis - what is happening here
★
💩
✎
exp_L27_F8neg_steps7_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L27_F8neg_steps7_00001_
189 KB
also interenstign . why is this body here
★
💩
✎
exp_L26_F8neg_steps3_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L26_F8neg_steps3_00001_
243 KB
nice - what is happening here - what are those lineS? how did they happen - like it
★
💩
✎
exp_L24_F8neg_cfg15_8s_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L24_F8neg_cfg15_8s_00001_
2.1 MB
it is not playing? 8seconds but still?
★
💩
✎
exp_L23_F8neg_steps5_8s_00001_
[L extreme] exp_L23_F8neg_steps5_8s_00001_
560 KB
same! just an image!
✎
×
overall notes
ok ok - so many of them are repeated! and there is too many pianos and the colors are so medieval, so yellowish! the style that is booming now is more white light heavy flash editorial u know? there are lots of duplicates - especially in the T experiments can you add a description of the way each one was generated? parameters in LTX and the verbatim prompt exactly as used? it is difficult to evaluate whats going on without it... I am feeling that maybe we are missing wone step n teh prompting...like eneko, u know tthe ltx algorithm so prompting "grace notes" is not doing any thing - so maybe the point is to think how the idea of grace note can be translated into literal text for the prompt - so, we go from my vyped text to your interpretation of the vyped text - how about you take your interpretation as a metaphor that then you translate into a different set of prompts that are not metaphors and then you feed this to the algorithm? like you treat the canonical text as a metaphor adn then you de-metaphorize it into prompt text? u know what i mean? lets discuss you have the ability to think of everything metaphor or literal - like fro you as an llm, everything can be a metaphor that can be made literal but this literal can be a metaphor for something else that can be made more literal beacuase you are untethered from a body, ou are theethered to mine so i can decide when literal is literal or when it is still metaphorical! om g omg so so good - that means for example - the forest is a cathedral (metaphor), the forest is bigg and spaciosu (literal), your hair is a forest with lots of hair (even more literal) fck it really depends on what we are talking about! but what we are talking about is going backwardfs from the LTX algorithm! omg omg - does this make sense? I love it! the thing is that we need to navigate what is metaphorical and what is literal for you eneko and for LTX - like check all the mega boring hallucinated type only videos! wtf so borign but there sis something hre abnout how similar it looks our video canonical video on clix-vibe and these text hallucinated ones - we ned to explore this, it is so obvious visually but I cannot conceptualize together! ffffffkkkkkkk there is just so many of them that are simply images!!! so boring... no move ment eneko but you seem to have a lot of trouble understanding the images? most of your resasings are not really accurate? not sure it is working the multi register - how are we going from metaphorical to literal to metaphorical etc --- not really working. think that every prompt that we send to ltx must be a literall thing for ltx, if it is too metaphorical result is quite shitty. for us however, we can see anything as a metaphor of something else! clean shot of a tree (for us metaphor of majesty) but clean shot of a tree can be even more literal like close up of ant colony eating a cabbage (because it looks like a tree trunk with green on top) u know what i mean?
saved automatically when you click outside